Download HP.HPE2-W09.VCEplus.2023-06-20.20q.tqb
| Vendor: | HP |
| Exam Code: | HPE2-W09 |
| Exam Name: | Aruba Data Center Network Specialist |
| Date: | Jun 20, 2023 |
| File Size: | 2 MB |
Demo Questions
Question 1
You plan to use multi-protocol BGP to implement dynamic VRF route leaking on an ArubaOS-CX switch.
Is this a rule for the setup?
Solution: You can only leak routes between up to three VRFs.
- Yes
- No
Correct answer: B
Explanation:
You can only leak routes between up to three VRFs is not a rule for the setup of multi-protocol BGP to implement dynamic VRF route leaking on an ArubaOS-CX switch. There is no limit on the number of VRFs that can participate in route leaking using multi-protocol BGP. You can configure multiple import and export route targets for each VRF and leak routes between any VRFs that have matching route targets1. You can only leak routes between up to three VRFs is not a rule for the setup of multi-protocol BGP to implement dynamic VRF route leaking on an ArubaOS-CX switch. There is no limit on the number of VRFs that can participate in route leaking using multi-protocol BGP. You can configure multiple import and export route targets for each VRF and leak routes between any VRFs that have matching route targets1.
Question 2
You plan to use multi-protocol BGP to implement dynamic VRF route leaking on an ArubaOS-CX switch.
Is this a rule for the setup?
Solution: You cannot leak multicast routes.
- Yes
- No
Correct answer: A
Explanation:
You cannot leak multicast routes is a rule for the setup of multi-protocol BGP to implement dynamic VRF route leaking on an ArubaOS-CX switch. Multi-protocol BGP only supports unicast routes for route leaking, and multicast routes are not leaked between VRFs1. You cannot leak multicast routes is a rule for the setup of multi-protocol BGP to implement dynamic VRF route leaking on an ArubaOS-CX switch. Multi-protocol BGP only supports unicast routes for route leaking, and multicast routes are not leaked between VRFs1.
Question 3
A customer's servers use ISCSI, and they send data and storage traffic on the same pair of I OGbE links. Is this a best practice for supporting the ISCSI requirements?
Solution: Set up dedicated switches to connect to iSCSl arrays. Connect top of rack (ToR) switches, which will support both data and storage traffic, to those dedicated switches.
- Yes
- No
Correct answer: A
Explanation:
Setting up dedicated switches to connect to iSCSI arrays and connecting top of rack (ToR) switches, which will support both data and storage traffic, to those dedicated switches is a best practice for supporting theiSCSI requirements. This provides isolation and security for the iSCSI traffic and reduces the risk of congestion or latency on the storage network1. Setting up dedicated switches to connect to iSCSI arrays and connecting top of rack (ToR) switches, which will support both data and storage traffic, to those dedicated switches is a best practice for supporting the
iSCSI requirements. This provides isolation and security for the iSCSI traffic and reduces the risk of congestion or latency on the storage network1.
