Download ECCouncil.312-49.TestKing.2018-09-29.190q.tqb

Vendor:	ECCouncil
Exam Code:	312-49
Exam Name:	Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator
Date:	Sep 29, 2018
File Size:	1 MB

Download Exam

Demo Questions

You are assigned to work in the computer forensics lab of a state police agency. While working on a high profile criminal case, you have followed every applicable

procedure, however your boss is still concerned that the defense attorney might question whether evidence has been changed while at the lab.

What can you do to prove that the evidence is the same as it was when it first entered the lab?

make an MD5 hash of the evidence and compare it with the original MD5 hash that was taken when the evidence first entered the lab
make an MD5 hash of the evidence and compare it to the standard database developed by NIST
there is no reason to worry about this possible claim because state labs are certified
sign a statement attesting that the evidence is the same as it was when it entered the lab

Correct answer: A

Study the log given below and answer the following question:

Apr 24 14:46:46 [4663]: spp_portscan: portscan detected from 194.222.156.169

Apr 24 14:46:46 [4663]: IDS27/FIN Scan: 194.222.156.169:56693 -> 172.16.1.107:482

Apr 24 18:01:05 [4663]: IDS/DNS-version-query: 212.244.97.121:3485 -> 172.16.1.107:53

Apr 24 19:04:01 [4663]: IDS213/ftp-passwd-retrieval: 194.222.156.169:1425 -> 172.16.1.107:21

Apr 25 08:02:41 [5875]: spp_portscan: PORTSCAN DETECTED from 24.9.255.53

Apr 25 02:08:07 [5875]: IDS277/DNS-version-query: 63.226.81.13:4499 -> 172.16.1.107:53

Apr 25 02:08:07 [5875]: IDS277/DNS-version-query: 63.226.81.13:4630 -> 172.16.1.101:53

Apr 25 02:38:17 [5875]: IDS/RPC-rpcinfo-query: 212.251.1.94:642 -> 172.16.1.107:111

Apr 25 19:37:32 [5875]: IDS230/web-cgi-space-wildcard: 198.173.35.164:4221 -> 172.16.1.107:80

Apr 26 05:45:12 [6283]: IDS212/dns-zone-transfer: 38.31.107.87:2291 -> 172.16.1.101:53

Apr 26 06:43:05 [6283]: IDS181/nops-x86: 63.226.81.13:1351 -> 172.16.1.107:53

Apr 26 06:44:25 victim7 PAM_pwdb[12509]: (login) session opened for user simple by (uid=0)

Apr 26 06:44:36 victim7 PAM_pwdb[12521]: (su) session opened for user simon by simple(uid=506)

Apr 26 06:45:34 [6283]: IDS175/socks-probe: 24.112.167.35:20 -> 172.16.1.107:1080

Apr 26 06:52:10 [6283]: IDS127/telnet-login-incorrect: 172.16.1.107:23 -> 213.28.22.189:4558

Precautionary measures to prevent this attack would include writing firewall rules. Of these firewall rules, which among the following would be appropriate?

Disallow UDP53 in from outside to DNS server
Allow UDP53 in from DNS server to outside
Disallow TCP53 in from secondaries or ISP server to DNS server
Block all UDP traffic

Correct answer: A

When monitoring for both intrusion and security events between multiple computers, it is essential that the computers' clocks are synchronized. Synchronized time allows an administrator to reconstruct what took place during an attack against multiple computers. Without synchronized time, it is very difficult to determine exactly when specific events took place, and how events interlace. What is the name of the service used to synchronize time among multiple computers?